THE 456th FIGHTER INTERCEPTOR SQUADRON

THE PROTECTORS OF  S. A. C.

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

F-94 Starfire Interceptor

 

The Lockheed F-94 "Starfire" Interceptor

+ Larger Font | - Smaller Font

 

The two-place F-94 was this nation's first operational jet all-weather interceptor. It was developed from the single-seat F-80 Shooting Star which had been the Army Air Forces' first operational jet aircraft procured in significant quantities. Although the F-94 had a redesigned fuselage, it used the F-80 tail, wing, and landing gear. The Starfire was also the first U.S. production jet to have an afterburner, which provided brief periods of additional engine thrust. It was equipped with radar in the nose to permit the observer in the rear seat to locate an enemy aircraft at night or in poor weather. The pilot then flew the Starfire into proper position for an attack based upon the observer's radar indications.

F-94s were primarily deployed for the defense of the United States in the early 1950s, serving with Air Defense Command squadrons. Many Air National Guard units were later equipped with F-94s.

Lockheed produced 853 F-94s for the Air Force, beginning in December 1949. Of these, 110 were F-94As and 355 were F-94Bs.

TYPE       Number built/Converted       Remarks
YF-94        2 (cv)                                     Prototype; from TF-80C
F-94A        110                                         Production a/c  
YF-94B      1                                            Prototype; S/N 49-2497    
F-94B         355                                        Imp. F-94A; Fletcher tip tanks

SPECIFICATIONS (F-94A)
Span: 38 ft. 9 in.
Length: 40 ft. 1 in.
Height: 12 ft. 2 in.
Weight: 15,330 lbs. maximum
Armament: Four .50-cal. machine guns
Engines: Allison J33-A-33 of 6,000 lbs. thrust with afterburner
Cost: $258,000

PERFORMANCE
Maximum speed: 630 mph
Cruising speed: 520 mph
Range: 930 miles
Service ceiling: 42,750 ft.

 

The F-94  "Starfighter"

 

By Joe Baugher

The Lockheed F-94A

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

During the 1947 Soviet Aviation Day display at Tushino Airport, a surprise appearance was put in by three four-engined long-range strategic bombers. They were early examples of the Tupolev Tu 4, which was a bolt-for-bolt copy of the Boeing B-29 Superfortress, several examples of which had been interned in the Soviet Union after having been forced to land there during bombing raids against Japan. Since the USSR was expected soon to have nuclear weapons, the appearance of the Soviet "Superfortresski" was a shock to US military planners, since it meant that the US mainland might soon be vulnerable to nuclear attack from the air.

The immediate postwar years had left the USAF without any truly modern all-weather fighters to face this new threat. Early attempts to develop jet-powered all-weather fighters ran into a series of snags and delays. The Curtiss XP-87 Blackhawk had been ordered in December of 1945, but it ran into developmental difficulties and the project was eventually totally abandoned in October of 1948. The Northrop P-89 Scorpion was deemed to have greater promise, but it too ran into teething troubles and did not show promise of entering service until 1952 at the earliest. Due to the lack of any suitable jet-powered replacement, the wartime Northrop P-61 Black Widow night fighter was forced to soldier on for a few more years. In order to help fill in the gap until the Scorpion could be available, night fighter adaptations of the piston-engined North American F-82 Twin Mustang were developed and hastily deployed.

The failure of the Curtiss Blackhawk and the delays in the Northrop Scorpion program forced the USAF to consider alternatives. To solve its immediate need for a jet-powered night fighter, in March of 1948 the USAF approached Lockheed with the prospect of fitting its TF-80C two-seat trainer with armament and a Hughes E-1 fire control system. The E-1 system incorporated an AN/APG-33 radar installation coupled with a Sperry A-1C computing gunsight. This system was developed from the AN/APG-3 radar used in the Convair B-36's tail armament. The USAF was in a hurry, and wanted the first production aircraft to be available before the end of 1949.

On October 8, 1948, a General Operational Requirement (GOR) was issued calling for the development of an all-weather interceptor.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Lockheed assigned the company designation of Model 780 to the project. Clarence R. "Kelly" Johnson entrusted the development of the new fighter to a team headed by Russ Daniell. Fortunately, the TF-80C airframe had sufficient volume to house the fire-control system in a modified nose and enough room in the aft cockpit to house the radar operator's position and his associated equipment. Consequently, it appeared at first glance that the adaptation of trainer to night fighter would be relatively straightforward, and the concept was endorsed by the Secretary of Defense on October 14, 1948 which called for the development of the two-seat radar-equipped TF-80C. A Letter of Contract was awarded to Lockheed in January of 1949. The designation F-94 was assigned to the project.

However, early design work soon indicated that the standard Allison J33 of the TF-80C would have insufficient power to accommodate the additional weight of the fire control equipment and armament, resulting in a fighter with a relatively low maximum speed and poor climbing performance. In search of more power, the decision was made to switch to an afterburning version of the Allison J33-A-33, rated at 4400 lb.s.t. dry and 6000 lb.s.t with afterburning. The afterburning engine required a longer and deeper rear fuselage, which pulled the center of gravity to the rear. However, the shift in center of gravity was offset by the weight of the E-1 fire control system installed in a longer forward fuselage and the APG-33 radar set mounted in an upswept nose. An armament of six 0.50-in M-3 machine guns had originally been planned, but space restrictions in the forward fuselage forced the limitation of the armament to only four guns. The guns were mounted in the lower nose section, with their muzzles located just aft of the radome. The air intakes were redesigned and enlarged, the tail surfaces were increased in area, and the internal fuel capacity was reduced to 318 US gallons. However, two 165-gallon under-wing tip tanks could be carried, bring total fuel capacity to 648 US gallons.

Two TF-80Cs (48-356 and 48-373) were modified as prototypes for the F-94 all weather fighter. They were designated ETF-80C, which was later changed to ET-33A when the TF-80C became T-33A. They were unofficially known as YF-94. They initially lacked the radar, the weapons, and most of the operational equipment that was to be fitted to production aircraft. They had the distinctive upturned nose that was to characterize the future F-94A/B, and they featured a frameless T-33-type canopy. Teardrop fuel tanks were mounted underneath the wingtips. The maiden flight took place from the Van Nuys airport on April 16, 1949, with Tony LeVier and Glenn Fulkerson at the controls.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Initial flight tests proved that the handling characteristics were generally satisfactory, but lots of problems cropped up with the afterburner. At that time, afterburners were a relatively new innovation, and there were lots of bugs that had to be ironed out. The engine of the YF-94 suffered from frequent flameouts, often with very difficult relights. These problems were eventually solved by Allison and Lockheed engineers working together to develop a new flame-holder system for the afterburner. The solution to the afterburner problems resulted in the F-94 being cleared for full production and service.

The first production version was the F-94A. One hundred and nine examples had been ordered in January of 1949. Despite reduction of the Air Force budget that occurred as a result of the FY 1949 budgetary crisis, the F-94 procurement quickly rose to 288. The Soviet detonation of an atomic bomb in August 1949 resulted in yet another increase in F-94 procurement to 368 aircraft.

The F-94A was generally similar to the YF-94s, but carried full operational equipment. The seventeen F-94A-1-LOs were practically hand-built models constructed from T-33 airframes taken over from the production line, but the remainder were started on the production line as F-94As. The nose of the F-94A housed four 0/5-inch machine guns with 300 rounds each. The belted ammunition was carried in boxes mounted just head of the cockpit firewall and just behind the avionics boxes. The machine gun armament could be supplemented by a pair of 1000-pound bombs for night bombing missions. A 165 US-gallon teardrop-shaped drop tank could be carried underneath each wingtip.

The first F-94A was accepted by the USAF in December of 1949. A total of 109 were built before production switched to the more reliable F-94B model. The F-94A was the first production fighter to be equipped with an afterburner as standard equipment, and it was the first jet-powered all-weather interceptor to serve with the USAF. The F-94A began replacing the North American F-82 Twin Mustangs of the 317th Fighter Interceptor Squadron at McChord AFB in Washington and the 319th Fighter Interceptor Squadron at Moses Lake AFB in Washington in May of 1950.

Click on Picture to enlarge

However, the F-94As proved to be rather troublesome in service, being fraught with engine and electronics problems. The afterburning Allison J-33 engine suffered from frequent turbine blade failures and the fuel system was quite unreliable. The aircraft was unstable and hard to maneuver at high altitude. The pilot and radar operator found that the cockpit was too narrow for them to be able to get in and out of the aircraft quickly during alerts and scrambles. The clearance for the ejection seats was too small, resulting in several tragic accidents during emergency ejections. The fire control radar was quite quirky and unreliable, and the crew members could never be sure that if their system was working at the beginning of a flight that it would still be functional at the end. With the Hughes E-1 fire control system, attacks and firing passes were actually made from the old "pursuit curve" type of attack which resembled a "tail chase" more than a 90-degree, lead collision type of firing pass.  The radar gunsight was used to fire at the target aircraft once it was in range.  Unfortunately, this exposed the attacking aircraft to the target aircraft's defensive firepower for a rather long period of time.  

During service, the early one-piece canopy of the F-94A was replaced by a canopy with a bow frame in the center between the two crew members. This feature was eventually adopted for all subsequent F-94 models as well as on the T-33 trainer. The original under-wing tip tanks were replaced in service by Fletcher centerline tip tanks with a capacity of 230 US gallons each. Some F-94As were fitted with a pod mounted on the leading edge of each wing which carried a pair of 0.50-inch machine guns, bringing the total forward-firing armament to eight machine guns.

The prototype YF-94 (48-356) is on display at Lackland AFB in Texas.

 

Serials of the F-94A:

ETF-80C->ET-33A 48-356 and 357 converted to YF-94 
49-2479/2495 	Lockheed F-94A-1-LO 
49-2479/2495 	Lockheed F-94A-1-LO
49-2496/2588 	Lockheed F-94A-5-LO

 

The Lockheed F-94B

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The next production version of the F-94 series was the F-94B. The F-94B was outwardly virtually identical to the F-94A, differing primarily in having improved internal equipment and systems.

The nineteenth F-94A airframe (49-2497) was modified during production as a testbed for these new and improved systems, the aircraft being redesignated YF-94B. These items included a Sperry Zero Reader which could be coupled to the ILS indicator to give the pilot an in-cockpit reading of his glide slope for bad-weather landings, an improved hydraulic system, and a high-pressure oxygen system. The pilot was provided with a more roomy cockpit. The Fletcher center-line wingtip tanks were adopted as standard.

The YF-94B flew for the first time on September 28, 1950. The first F-94B-1-LO was delivered to the USAF in January of 1951. The F-94B-5-LO differed by being equipped for Arctic service.

The first F-94B reached service in April of 1951 with the 61st Fighter Interceptor Squadron based at Selfridge AFB in Michigan. A total of 356 F-94Bs were built. The F-94B cured most of the engine and electronics reliability problems experienced by the F-94A, and proved in service to be a thoroughly reliable aircraft with relatively few vices and shortcomings.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Service use of the F-94A/B was primarily with the Continental Air Command, which had been set up in December of 1948 as an overall command structure to cover the Air Defense Command, the Tactical Air Command, plus some fighter squadrons that had previously been assigned to the Strategic Air Command. The F-94A/B also flew with the Alaskan Air Command, protecting the USA from Soviet bombers flying in from Siberia. For three years between 1950 and 1953, the F-94A/B played a vital role in the defense of the continental United States from attack by nuclear-armed Soviet Tu 4 bombers. It was the only jet-powered all-weather interceptor available in quantity at that time, and filled in a vital gap until more advanced equipment could be provided. After wringing out some initial bugs, the F-94A/B interceptors proved to be quite reliable and relatively easy to maintain in the field. However, the F-94A/B lacked sufficient range and adequate climbing speed to make it a really good interceptor, and its armament did not pack sufficient punch to be considered really effective against bombers.

Although in retrospect the Soviet long-range bomber threat of the early 1950s was greatly exaggerated, this does not take anything away from the F-94A/B, which was able to serve with distinction when nothing else was available.

The F-94B was the first *American* jet-powered all-weather fighter to enter combat (the radar-equipped Messerschmitt Me 262B of the German Luftwaffe was actually the first jet-powered night fighter to participate in combat, taking part in the last-ditch defense of Berlin in March of 1945). The first F-94As to reach the Far East Air Force (FEAF) arrived at Itazuke AFB in Japan in March of 1951, equipping the 68th Fighter Interceptor Squadron. They were deployed to Japan primarily to guard US bases in Japan against attack by Soviet bombers. By the end of 1951, this squadron began posting two F-94s on strip alert at Suwon AFB in Korea. They were to be scrambled in case any enemy night intruders came South. During the Korean War, similar duty was carried out by the 339th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, which converted from F-82Gs to F-94Bs in 1951 at Chitose. The 319th Fighter Interceptor Squadron began operating F-94Bs from Suwon on March 22, 1952.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Initially, the F-94s operating in Korea were there only to protect their bases from night-flying enemy intruders. They were forbidden to operate over enemy territory, lest their sensitive radar fire control systems fall into enemy hands. However, mounting losses of B-29 bombers following the Chinese and North Korean development of night interception tactics finally led to the lifting of this restriction in January of 1953. In that month, the F-94s of the 319th Fighter Interceptor Squadron began flying defensive patrols in advance of the night-flying bombers. On the night of January 30, 1953, an F-94B flown by Capt B. L. Fithian as pilot and Lieut S. R. Lyons as radar operator shot down an unseen Lavochkin La-9 piston-engined fighter, scoring first blood for the F-94B. The Korean-based F-94Bs destroyed three more enemy aircraft during the next six months, but one F-94B was destroyed on the night of June 12 when it collided with a Polikarpov Po-2 biplane.

F-94B-5-LO serial number 51-5502 was modified to test the radar and guidance system of the F-99 (later IM-99) Bomarc missile. The radar and armament in the nose were deleted and replaced by the needle-shaped nose of the Bomarc, making the nose aout 17 feet longer. The longer nose required that additional equipment and ballast be added to the rear of the aircraft. The aircraft was re-designated NF-94B.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Two F-94Bs (51-5500/5501) were modified to become aerodynamic test prototypes for the proposed F-94D ground attack version, and were re-designated YF-94D.

Three Air National Guard units, the 121st FIS (DC ANG), the 142nd FIS (Maine ANG) and the 148th FIS (Pennsylvania ANG), operated the F-94A/B while they served on active duty during the Korean War call-up. However, these F-94s were retained by the USAF when these ANG squadrons returned to State control on October 31, 1951.

The A and B versions of the F-94 were phased out of USAF squadrons by mid-1954 as more advanced interceptors such as the Northrop F-89C/D Scorpion and the North American F-86D Sabre became available in quantity. As they left USAF service, they were passed along to Air National Guard units. F-94A/Bs reentered ANG service in June of 1953 when they replaced F-51H Mustangs in the 137th FIS of the New York ANG. Before being transferred to the ANG, the F-94A/Bs had their cockpits widened to improve the chance of a successful ejection in the event of trouble. The original narrow cockpit had resulted in several unfortunate accidents during emergency ejections.

In ANG service, a number of F-94As were fitted with a twin-gun pod on each wing leading edge. Each pod carried a pair of forward-firing Browning M3 0/50-inch machine guns. This brought the total number of forward-firing 0.50-inch machine guns to eight. The mid-wing pods created very little additional drag and increased the loaded weight only slightly.

Click on Picture to enlarge

When I was in high school back in 1957, I went on a class trip to Philadelphia to visit Independence Hall and the Franklin Institute. On our way back home to the lower Eastern Shore of Maryland, we stopped the bus somewhere in northern Delaware and got off to get a bite to eat. The restaurant happened by chance to be near the end of an airport runway. While I was walking back to the bus, suddenly a pair of F-94Bs doing a formation takeoff under full afterburner screamed off the runway less than a hundred yards over my head. It sounded like a thousand howling banshees. I'll never forget that sight and sound as long as I live.

The F-94A/B served with the following ANG squadrons: 101, 102, 103, 109, 114, 116, 118, 123, 131, 132, 133, 134, 136, 137, 138, 139, 175, 178, 179, 180, and 190. The last F-94A/Bs left ANG service in 1959.

A design study for a two-seat radar combat trainer based on the F-94B was initiated under the company designation L-199, but it never got past the drawing board.

Serials of the F-94B:
 

49-2497 	Lockheed YF-94B 
50-805/876 	Lockheed F-94B-1-LO 

50-878/954 	Lockheed F-94B-1-LO
51-5307/5512 	Lockheed F-94B-5-LO

Specifications of the F-94B:

One Allison J33-A-33 or -33A turbojet rated at 4400 lb.st. dry and 6000 lb.st with afterburning. Wingspan 37 feet 6 inches (38 feet 11 inches with wingtip tanks), length 40 feet 1 inches, height 12 feet 8 inches, wing area 234.8 square feet. Weights: 10,064 pounds empty, 13,474 pounds loaded, 16,844 pound maximum. Maximum speed 606 mph at sea level. Initial climb rate 6850 feet per minute. Service ceiling 48,0-00 feet. Normal range 665 miles, maximum range 905 miles. Armed with four 0.50-inch M-3 machine guns in the nose.

 

 

The Lockheed F-97 / F-94D Starfire

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The F-94A/B all-weather interceptors of the USAF were considered only as interim types which would fill in the gap for a couple of years until more advanced aircraft could be made available in quantity. Once their initial problems had been corrected, the F-94A/B proved to be quite reliable all-weather interceptors and were relatively easy to maintain in the field. However, the F-94A/B lacked sufficient range and climbing speed to make it a really good interceptor, and its armament did not pack sufficient punch to be considered really effective against bombers.

In July 1948, four months before receiving the contract for the first batch of F-94As, Lockheed issued a proposal to the USAF for a more advanced development of the F-94A concept. The project was given the company designation of L-188. In order to achieve higher Mach numbers, the L-188 featured a completely new wing with reduced thickness and greater dihedral. The speed brakes were revised and the fuel capacity was increased. The aircraft was to be provided with a drag 'chute, being the first USAF fighter to be so equipped. Since more power was clearly needed, a Pratt & Whitney J48 afterburning turbojet was to be fitted. This engine was a license-built version of the British-designed Rolls-Royce Tay. With afterburning, this engine offered 8750 pounds of thrust. The increased engine thrust required that the air intakes be revised and made larger. The rear fuselage had to be revised in order to accommodate this new engine. A more advanced Hughes E-5 fire control system with APG-40 radar was to be used. The machine gun armament of the F-94A was to be replaced by an all-rocket armament mounted in the fuselage nose.

Click on Picture to enlarge

The USAF was initially not all that interested in the Lockheed proposal, preferring to concentrate on the North American F-86D Sabre and the Northrop F-89 Scorpion. Nevertheless, the USAF thought enough of the proposal that they assigned it a designation of F-97. A new F-number was selected for the Lockheed proposal since it was almost a complete redesign of the F-94.

Undeterred by the USAF's initial lukewarm response to their L-188 proposal, Lockheed decided in 1949 to go ahead with the construction of a company-funded demonstrator aircraft that would combine the L-188 wing with a F-94A fuselage from which the military armament and fire control systems had been omitted. Since the J48 engine was not yet ready, the demonstrator was fitted with an imported non-afterburning Rolls-Royce Tay.

Bearing the civil registration N94C, the unarmed demonstrator flew for the first time on January 19, 1950, with test pilot Tony LeVier at the controls. It retained the original nose of the F-94A, and had non-standard teardrop-shaped centerline-mounted wingtip tanks. The USAF was sufficiently impressed that in February 1950 they purchased the unarmed L-188 demonstrator under the designation YF-97. The military serial number 50-955 replaced the original civil registration number. At the same time, the USAF ordered a fully militarized prototype YF-97 under the serial number 50-877. 180 production examples were ordered under the designation F-97A. The company designation for the F-97A was Model 880.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Initial trials with the L-188/YF-97 demonstrator turned up several problems which were corrected by progressive modifications. The wing root extension fillet of the original L-188 wing was removed in order to improve stall characteristics during landing approach. The original horizontal stabilizer of the F-94 was replaced by power-boosted swept surfaces to eliminate an annoying high-frequency vibration that took place at high Mach numbers. Dampers were added to correct aileron buzzing. Spoilers were added to improve roll control. The vertical fin was made larger in order to increase directional stability at high speeds. When the American-built Tay finally became available, the first YF-97 was re-engined with a J48-P-3 engine, rated at 6000 lb.s.t. dry and 8000 lb.s.t with afterburning.

On September 12, 1950, the YF-97 was re-designated YF-94C. Even though the YF-97 was almost a completely new aircraft, it was thought wise to pretend that the design was simply a "logical extension" of an existing aircraft. Political considerations often play an important role in the choice of aircraft designations.

The name Starfire was applied to the F-94C by publicists, following the tradition of naming Lockheed aircraft after celestial objects. The C-variant was the only variant in the F-94 series to carry this name.

Click on Picture to enlarge

The two YF-94Cs continued to be used for tests of the improved fire control system and the all-rocket armament. The all-rocket armament consisted of twenty-four 2.75-inch Folding-Fin Aircraft Rockets (FFAR) mounted in four groups surrounding the APG-40 radome in the nose. The rockets in each group were mounted inside a door which opened sideways on the ground for easy servicing and reloading. In front of each rocket group was a snap-action door which opened immediately before firing. The YF-94Cs were fitted with a revised fuel system accommodating 566 US gallons in wing and fuselage tanks, 500 gallons in center-mounted wingtip tanks, and 460 gallons in mid-wing drop tanks mounted on pylons at the wing center for a total fuel capacity of 1526 gallons. There were difficulties with the drag chute, with the automatic pilot, with the afterburner of the J48, and with aileron flutter. These problems were not fully resolved until after the first F-94C production aircraft had been delivered.

The first production F-94C was delivered in July of 1951. The production F-94C was powered by the Pratt & Whitney J48-P-5 engine rated at 6350 lb.s.t. dry and 8750 lb.s.t. with afterburning. Teething problems delayed the introduction of the F-94C into squadron service for almost two years. The F-94C finally entered service with the 437th Fighter Interceptor Squadron at Otis AFB in Massachusetts in June of 1953. The F-94C was the second type of fighter serving with the Air Defense Command (ADC) to use rockets as its sole armament, the North American F-86D Sabre being the first.

Initially, the F-94C suffered with some of the same teething troubles which had not been completely ironed out during the testing of the YF-94Cs. The E-5 fire control system had reliability problems. The cockpit seal tended to leak, causing electrical short-circuits. In addition, the jet engine tended to flame out when the nose rockets were fired. However, once these difficulties were cleared up, the F-94C became popular with its flight and maintenance crews. The rocket armament of the F-94C was considered to be more accurate than that of the F-86D Sabre, owing to the use of closed-breech launchers by the F-94C which increased the velocity of the rockets. However, the firing of the nose rockets violently shook the F-94C and blinded both crew members in exhaust smoke and fire.

Click on Picture to enlarge

387 F-94C aircraft were built and delivered between July of 1951 and May of 1954. In 1953, F-94Cs were delivered to the 29th, 48th, 66th,332nd, 438th, and 497th Fighter Interceptor Squadrons. In 1954-55, F-94Cs went to the 27th, 39th, 61st, 64th, and 318th Squadrons. Most of these squadrons served in the mainland United States, although the 39th did serve for a time in Japan.

In the course of its production and service life, the F-94C was progressively improved and upgraded, with new features continually being added in the field. New and improved ejector seats were provided, variable-position dive brakes were fitted, and a better drag chute was added. Beginning with the 100th F-94C leaving the production line, a twelve-rocket pod was mounted on each wing leading edge, doubling the armament of the Starfire. A frangible plastic nose covered the front of each pod, which shattered when the rockets were fired. These mid-wing rocket pods were retrofitted to earlier production machines. Owing to the crew blinding problem during rocket firing, the nose rockets were often omitted from F-94Cs in the field, the rocket armament being carried exclusively in the mid-wing pods. The nose radome initially had a rather blunt shape, but it was soon replaced by a more pointed radome which quickly became standard.

The F-94C Starfire became the first all-weather fighter to break the sound barrier, which happened by accident when test pilot Herman "Fish" Salmon put his F-94C into a dive from 45,000 feet, rolling over in afterburner.

Click on Picture to enlarge

A single F-94C was used to test the adoption of the Hughes GAR-1 Falcon missile as part of the basic armament of the Starfire. This aircraft was re-designated DF-94C. Although the Falcon missile was never made part of the Starfire's operational armament, these experiments provided data for later generations of ADC interceptors.

F-94C serial number 50-963 was experimentally fitted with an enlarged nose in which reconnaissance cameras were mounted in place of the interceptor's radar and rockets. This plane was re-designated EF-94C, the E standing for *Exempt*. E was used rather than the regular R for Reconnaissance because this aircraft was to be used strictly for research purposes.

The service life of the F-94C Starfire with the USAF was quite short, most of these aircraft being phased out and replaced by more advanced types after only a half-dozen years of service. The last F-94C left USAF service in February of 1959.

After leaving USAF service, F-94Cs were passed along to the Air National Guard. With the F-94Cs supplementing the earlier F-94A/B, the Starfire equipped twenty-one Fighter Interceptor Squadrons of the Air National Guard. The last F-94Cs were phased out of ANG service by the 179th Fighter Interceptor Squadron at the Duluth Municipal Airport, Minnesota during the summer of 1959.

Serials of the F-94C Starfire:

50-877 		Lockheed YF-97 Starfire -- later redesignated YF-94C 
50-955 		Lockheed YF-97 Starfire -- later redesignated YF-94C 
50-956/1063 	Lockheed F-94C-1-LO Starfire 
51-5513/5698 	Lockheed F-94C-1-LO Starfire 
51-13511/13603 	Lockheed F-94C-1-LO Starfire 

Specification of the F-94C:

Engine: One Pratt & Whitney J48-P-5 turbojet engine rated at 6350 lb.st. dry and 8750 lb.st. with afterburning. Dimensions: Wingspan 42 feet 5 inches with wingtip tanks, length 44 feet 6 inches, height 14 feet 11 inches, wing area 232.8 square feet. Weights: 12,708 pounds empty, 18,300 pounds loaded, 24,184 pound maximum. Performance: Maximum speed: 640 mph at sea level, 585 mph at 22,000 feet, 578 mph at 40,000 fee. Initial climb rate 7980 feet per minute. Service ceiling 51,400 feet. Normal range 805 miles, maximum range 1275 miles. Armament: Armed with twenty-four 2.75-inch Mighty Mouse FFARs in nose, plus twelve FFARs in each of two wing leading-edge pods.

 

 

The Lockheed F-94D

Click on Picture to enlarge

The F-94D was the designation applied to a proposed but not built single-seat fighter-bomber version of the F-94C Starfire.

In January of 1951, Lockheed was awarded a contract for 113 Model 980-75-14 single-seat fighter-bomber adaptations of the F-94C two-seat all-weather fighter. The designation was F-94D. Serials were 51-13604 through 13716. The fuselage, tail surfaces and J48 power plant of the F-94C were to be married to a new wing with 50 percent more area. The rear radar operator's position was to be removed and replaced by additional fuel tanks. 320-gallon wingtip and pylon tanks were to be used, bringing total fuel capacity to 1965 US gallons. A retractable in-flight refueling probe was to be installed in the upper nose. The rocket armament in the nose was to be replaced by eight 0.5-inch machine guns. The radar fire control system of the F-94C was to be replaced with ranging radar. Up to 4000 pounds of ordinance were to be carried on additional under wing racks.

In order to gain some flight test information, two aerodynamic configuration prototypes for the F-94D were obtained by fitting the new F-94D nose to a pair of F-94B-5-LOs (serial numbers 51-5500 and 51-5501). 51`-0500 was fit5ted 2ith four 0.50-inch machineguns and 51-5501 with possibly as many as six guns. This was essentially the same armament as that which was fitted to the F-94B, but with the guns being mounted higher up on the nose.

Aircraft 51-13604 was almost complete to serve as the prototype YF-94D when the USAF cancelled the entire F-94D program on October 15, 1951. The reason given by the USAF was that they wanted Lockheed to concentrate its full efforts on the F-94C program.

After the cancellation of the F-94D program, 51-5500 was used as a test bed for the General Electric T-171 (later M61A1) Vulcan rotary cannon.

 

Serials of F-94D Starfire

51-13604 	Lockheed YF-94D-1-LO Starfire - cancelled 
51-13605/13716 	Lockheed F-94D-1-LO Starfire - cancelled 

By Joe Baugher

 

Sources:

  1. Lockheed Aircraft Since 1913, Rene J. Francillon, Naval Institute Press, 1987.

    Fighters of the United States Air Force, Robert F. Dorr and David Donald, Temple Press Aerospace, 1990.
     

  2. The American Fighter, Enzo Angelucci and Peter Bowers, Orion, 1987.
     

  3. Lockheed F-94 Variants, Robert F. Dorr, Wings of Fame, Vol 13, 1998
     

  4. Marcelle Size Knaack, Post World War II Fighters, Office of Air Force History, 1986.
     

  5. E-mail from Carl Jordan on fire control system for F-94A.

 

 

The Lockheed F-94

 

Post Script

 

Click on Picture to enlarge


The first kill scored by F-94 was quite an obscure one. On 24 May 1951, a C-119 took off from Tachikawa AB, near Tokyo, with a crew of three and two US Army passengers. Shortly after take-off, there was a technical malfunction and the pilot ordered the crew and the passengers to bail out, radioing the base about his intentions. Two F-94Bs were scrambled to intercept the now uncontrollable transport aircraft, as it turned around on its own and headed back towards Tokyo.

Fully expecting the plane to crash into the nearest mountain, the two F-94-pilots followed the pilot-less C-119 for two and a half hours, while it finally crossed the coast and flew out over the Sea of Japan. Finally, the two F-94s were ordered to shot it down. After "many shots", the C-119 caught fire and crashed into the sea.

Later in the same year, the F-94As of the 68th FIS were briefly deployed to Korea. Concerned that their precious airborne radars might fall into enemy hands should one of the Starfires fall behind the enemy lines, the USAF pulled them out prematurely - and the type thus never came into position to challenge MiGs in the night skies over Northern Korea.

After the unit was re-equipped with F-94Bs, in 1952 the 319th FIS was deployed to Suwon, but still with orders not to fly over enemy territory. Despite immense problems with maintenance, with tremendous support from Hughes Company, the F-94 and its airborne radar eventually proved a success.

The restriction on use of F-94s in combat was lifted only in early 1953. The 319th FIS did not wait for long to cross its swords with opponent: on 30 January an F-94B flown by Capt. Benjamin L. Fithian and radar operator Lt. R. S. Lyons, was launched to intercept an intruding Lavochking La-9 fighter, never seen by friendly forces, but identified by interception of enemy communication. Fithian and Lyons established radar contact, approached, extended air brakes to stay behind their slow target, and attacked, using the radar scope only. Strikes from their machine-guns set the La-9 afire and sent it spinning into the sea.

By the end of the war, the F-94s in Korea claimed three additional kills - including a Polikarpov Po-2, on 3 May 1953; a MiG-15, on 10 May 1953. The last kill, reportedly against a MiG-15, should have been scored by Col. Robert V. McHale, CO 319th FIS, and his radar operator, Capt. Samuel Hoster, on 7 June 1953, at 22:45hr in the evening, near Namsi-dong. Supposedly, McHale and Hoster flew their F-94 "51-5503" through their slow-flying target, killing themselves and their opponent in the process. This claim was never officially credited, however, and it appears that no opponent was shot down at all during that engagement.
 

Click on Picture to enlarge

 

 

The F-94 Starfire

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The roots of development for the F-94 lay in the WW II P-80 Shooting Star, USAF's first truly operational jet fighter. Specifically, however, the F-94 interceptor stemmed from Lockheed's successful conversion of the basic P-80 into a two-seat trainer. This TF-80c, first flown in March 1948, became the T-33 in mid-1944. The F-94 was born the same year.

The GOR called for the extra punch of an all-weather jet interceptor. Early availability took precedence over it capability to counter any threat beyond that of the TU-4(Russian equivalent to the B-29).

One week after re-endorsing continued development of the Northrop F-89, the Air Force directed production of the two-place, radar-equipped F-80 (christened F-94 in 1949. Two major factors prompted the decision. The North American F-82 (the only "all-weather interceptor" available) was highly unsatisfactory. More over, operation integration of its replacement would probably be delayed, since the F-89 was an entirely new design. North American never built any interceptor-type F-82s. But the two-engine, twin-fuselage, low-wing, long-range escort fighter could be converted into a single-place interceptor by removing the controls and canopy from the right-hand cockpit. The F-82Fs, -Gs, and -Hs, officially classified as fighter interceptors, were two-seaters with a radar operator in place of the copilot. These F-82s actually could not cope with bad weather. Even as night fighters, their performance was becoming obsolete.

Secretary of Defense Forestall approval of the future interim F-94 in November 1948, followed by President Truman's release of funds, led to a January letter contract with Lockheed. This LC was replaced a few months later by a definitive contract (AF-1849) covering 150 F-94 productions (later reduced to 109).

The first flight of the aircraft was made on 16 April 1949 by a radar equipped TF-80. By on of two T-33A trainers (improved, re-designated TF-80Cs), modified modified for the interceptor role by adding radar noses and rear fuselage afterburners. Lockheed used the converted T-33s as F-94 prototypes to speed development, but both were little more than TF-SOCs. In effect, production aircraft flight-tested before the end of 1949 comprised 75 percent standard P-80C parts. Like the F80/T-33 Shooting Stars, the Starfire's first model (F-94A) had wing tip drop tanks. Advertising the Starftre's last model (F-94C) in later years, Lockheed praised it as "an engineering achievement of creating a more advanced model out of an existing airplane.” By then, however, the Air Force generally believed this was the aircraft's foremost shortcoming.

The F-94 program changed twice in less than a year. Despite reduction of the Air Force's size, procurement quickly rose to 288-almost double the quantity sought in January 1949. The August detonation of an atom bomb in Russia forced another evaluation of Air Force planning. The F-94 procurement was raised again in December (to 368 aircraft) because "foreign possession of the atomic bomb necessitates acceleration of the USAF program to modernize its interceptor and all-weather force at the earliest possible time." Growing F-94 importance brought renewed, concerted efforts to improve the aircraft's overall performance. Lockheed proposed and the Air Force bought the F -97A, a drastically redesigned F-94. When technical hindrances immediately arose, the Air Force had to endorse still another, but far less ambitious, F-94 configuration. This became the F-94B, while the F-97A ended up as the F-94C.

Specifications

 

Manufacturer: Lockheed Aircraft Corporation
Span: 37 ft .6 in.
Length: 37 ft. 8 in.
Height: 11 ft. 7 in.
Weight: 15,000 lbs. max
Armament: Two .50-cal. machine guns in nose
Engines: Allison J-33 of 5,400 lbs. thrust
Crew: Two
Cost: $123,000
Maximum speed: 525 mph.
Cruising speed: 455 mph.
Range: 1,000 miles
Service Ceiling: 45,000 ft.

F-94As began reaching air defense units about 6 months behind schedule. These makeshift interceptors were received at McChord and Moses Lake, Wash., by the 325th Fighter Wing of the Continental Air Command. CONAC, formed on 1 December 1948, included the Air Defense Command, the Tactical Air Command, and nine fighter squadrons formerly assigned to the Strategic Air Command. The rationale for CONAC (under economy programs of the pre-Korean years) was to train all fighter units for both tactical and air defense action. This would make many more aircraft available for all missions.

By the end of the year, CONAC's operational inventory counted 60 of the new F-94A. The F-94A's Allison J-33 engine, slated for the F-94B, did not work well. Despite improvement, it still suffered from turbine blade failures 2 years after the first F -94A had become operational. Also, the F-94's fuel system was far from perfect; the aircraft was unstable and hard to maneuver at high altitude. Moreover, the cockpits were too small. The pilot and radar operator found it impossible to get in and out quickly during alerts and scrambles. They had to fly in a cramped position. Even more vital, the clearance for seat ejection was slight.

The Air Force got Lockheed to correct the ejection seats and cockpits of 330 F-94 (A and B) aircraft for some $4.5 million. Minor improvements, already scheduled by the Air Force, would be done concurrently with the Lockheed modification. Excluding the coat of ordnance and government-furnished aeronautical equipment (GFAE).

All 109 F-94As were accepted by the Air Force between December 1949 and December 1950-14 in FY 50, and 95 in FY 51. Cost per aircraft was: 258,123.00-airframe, $193,721; engine (installed), $45,227; electronic, $4,014; armament, $15,161.

A few ANG squadrons, federalized during the Korean War, flew F-94s in late 1951. Upon reverting to inactive status, their planes stayed with active Air Defense Command units. Nonetheless, no F-94As remained in the USAF inventory in mid-1954. ADC was established on 21 March 1948. It lost its major air command status and became an operational command under CONAC in December 1948, but reemerged as a major air command on 1 January 1951

 

 

F-94B Starfire

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The F-97A (re-designated F-94C) was ordered right after the F-94A. The third model followed the F-94A in production and became the F-94B. New features of the F-94B included, gyroscopic instrument (Sperry Zero Reader) for more accurate landings in bad weather; high pressure oxygen system; improved hydraulic system; and larger, better-shaped, external fuel tanks. These were mounted along the airplane's center line instead of being suspended from the wings, as on the F-94A.

A converted F-94A, the 19th production, flew the maiden flight in December 1950. F-94Bs began reaching the operational forces a few months later. Despite its new features, the F-94B closely resembled the F-94A. The two had similar engines and cockpits, the same configuration weaknesses, and deficient fuel systems. Thus, they shared identical operational problems and required like postproduction modifications. Lacking adequate anti-icing equipment, neither the F-94A nor F 94B could qualify as an all-weather interceptor. The B's windshield-but not the A's-did have some kind of anti-icing system. Pending something better, ADC welcomed the B.

A handful of F-94Bs soon joined the 15 F-94As allocated to the Far East Air Forces in March 1951. The aircraft were so few, however, that they could not be easily spared. Hence, they did not enter the Korean war until late December 1951, when the 68th FIS posted two F -94s on strip alert at Suwon Air Base. The Air Force hurried the conversion of FEAF's old F-82s to more modern F-94Bs. In addition, it deployed the 319th FIS to Korea.. This unit's F-94Bs went into operation at Suwon on 22 March 1952. Even then the aircraft's involvement was limited to local air defense scrambles under positive ground-radar control. The new F-94s were fitted with the latest fire-control system. to Produced by the Hughes Aircraft Company, the E-1 was the first in the E series of sophisticated fire-control systems that were to equip more modern planes. The Air Force ordered the system in June 1948, when it asked that the AN/AP" radar (being developed for the tail defense of the B-36) be adapted to the Northrop F-89. A November amendment of the June contract extended the requirement to the F-94. The modified AN/APG-3 radar was re-designated AN/ APG-33 and the entire system, including its A-1C gun sight, became the E-1 in late 1949. It was installed in early F-89s as well as F-94As and -Bs. Low powered, the E-1 was fairly primitive alongside the E-5 of the rocket-firing F 94C. The system was nevertheless a pioneer achievement. The Air Force, therefore, did not want them to fly over enemy territory where this secret electronic equipment could be compromised. The restriction was not lifted until nearly a year later-after continued B 29 losses were tied to the ineffectiveness of fighter-escorts equipped with the older airborne-intercept radars. The 319th FIS in November 1952 began using some of its F 94Bs as a screen between the Yalu and Chongehon rivers. Soon after, F -94s also flew within a 30-mile radius of the B-29 targets. Enemy planes usually retreated rather than come up against F-94 barrier patrols.

Click on Picture to enlarge

Although not too successful against low-flying aircraft, few planes proved as reliable as the F -W against the enemy in the Korean war, even in nasty weather and darkness. Besides B 29 escort duties and enemy fighter interception missions, F --94s protected B-26 light bombers and could fly deep into North Korea when most other aircraft were grounded due to bad weather. Korean veterans as a rule praised the F-94. It was rugged and could fly many hours without maintenance.

The Air Force lost 28 F-94s between January 1952 and 27 July 1953-the day the war ended. Only one of the 28 losses was due to direct enemy action. During the same period, F-94 pilots claimed four enemy planes destroyed. The Air Force accepted 356 F-94Bs, 176 F-94Bs in FY 51 and 180 in FY 52-the last four in January 1952. Cost per aircraft was: $196,248.00-airframe, $123,422; engine (installed, $31,336; electronics, $7,635; ordnance, $2,947; armament, $30,908.

The F-94B, like the F-94A, left the active force by mid-1954. The Guard still flew the two models in late 1957. Milestones included using the E-1 fire-control system, the F 94 made its first Korean kill at night, destroying a conventional, but speedy LA-9. The Starfire pilot (Capt. Ben L. Fithian) and observer (Lt. Sam R. Lyons) never saw the enemy plane until it burst into flames. F -94s shot down three other elusive enemy jets before the armistice.

 

 

F-97A / F-94C Starfire

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

New feature included, Pratt & Whitney J48-P-5 or -5A engine (8,300-1b thrust with afterburner; 6,250-1b, without); thinner wings, with increased dihedral; sweptback horizontal stabilizer; aft dive flaps, drag chute; and longer nose with radome in retractable shield. All rocket armament accommodated 48 2.75-inch folding-fin aerial rockets 24 in a ring of firing tubes around the nose and 24 in two cylindrical pods. One pod was located on each of the two wings, midway between root and tip. Also featured were wing and horizontal stabilizer thermal de-icing, single-point refueling, greater fuel capacity, as well as the Hughes E-5 fire-control system and Westinghouse W-3A autopilot (for, instrument approach).

The prototype flight took place 11 months before the Yk'-9413's first official flight. Converted F-94A.s were used in each case. The entire F-94 program finally totaled 862 productions--109 F-94As (against a fret order for 160), 856 F-84Bs, and 387 F-94Cs (originally known as F-97As). Air Force records, however, showed only 2 prototypes (1 YF-94B and 1 YF-94C) officially accepted-others were accounted for as production aircraft, or charged to another program (as were the P-94A prototypes, developed from F-80C and T-33 productions).

The USAF decision for a redesigned F-94 (referred to as the F 97A) followed reappraisal of the F-94 program and January 1950 plans calling for haste in supplying the air defense forces with better and more of the Lockheed interim interceptors. The Air Force realized a drastically improved P-94A was not there for the asking. It then settled for a third, but "in-between type," that preceded the so-called F-97A-the F-94B, which still fell short of the Air Force's early 1960 expectations.

Click on Picture to enlarge

The F -97A, endorsed by the Air Force in February 1950, formally became the F-94C--third, biggest, and last of the F-94 model series as well as the final upshot of the basic Shooting Star design.

The F-94C ran immediately into trouble. To begin with, the first production deliveries were scheduled for 1951--far too early. Both the Pratt & Whitney J-48 engine and laminar wings specifically earmarked for the F-94C, were not likely to be fully developed when needed. Other improvements or new components (many also intended for the F-94B) were slipping. The automatic approach system was not ready; testing of the 250-kilowatt-radar, rocket nose, and collision-course sight was not due until 1951; development of an advanced fuel purging system showed scant progress, and the only autopilot available was too big even for the larger F-94C.

Although this plane was not accepted by the Air Force until May 1952, it did not go directly to the operational forces.

The Air Force allocated to the testing program the F -94C proto type (first flown as the YF-97A in January 1950 and accepted in October), together with 9 other aircraft received by the end of June 1962. None of these "test productions" performed well. ADC concluded that low speed (some 40 knots less than the F-89) and poor maneuverability downgraded the F-94C. Nevertheless, it would be acceptable if these deficiencies were corrected. Some of them-the unsatisfactory fuel system in particular-were reported by test pilots of the Air. Research and Development Center (ARDC) as resulting from poor design and substandard quality control during production. Others reflected a variety of causes that combined to erode the plane's efficiency.

Click on Picture to enlarge

On its first trial in August 1951, the F-94C's J48-P-5 engine had passed its 150-hour qualification test, but its afterburner had warped and cracked. After much testing and redesign, the engine finally passed new qualification tests in May 1952 with afterburner intact. Fuel burner nozzle failures occurred soon afterward. Since it was impossible to find defective nozzles by visual inspection, the F-94Cs were grounded. Fitting all engines with improved nozzles solved the problem before the end of 1952. Despite fairly good engine performance after some modifications, the Air Force in mid-1962 still sought to enhance the rate of climb and high-altitude reliability of the P-5. It considered switching to the higher thrust J48-P8, but installation difficulties wiped out the project.

A joint study (Headquarters USAF, Air Proving Ground Command (APGC), ARDC, and ADC) called for variable position dive brakes, aileron spoilers, a better drag chute, and further improvement of the engine reliability. The study also recommended speedy installation of the aircraft's new rocket armament (early F 94Cs still carried machineguns) and additional rockets.

By mid-October 1952, the F-94C's flight characteristics and controls were improved. More than $3.5 million had been allotted to modify the cockpits of early F-94Cs (Some 260 F-94Cs would probably feature the F-94A and F-94B small cockpits and the Air Force did not expect $3.5 million to fill the bill. ), and work was underway to correct the aircraft's inadequate de-icing boots and faulty stall warnings. Lockheed had also arranged for field installation of the variable position dive brakes and aileron spoilers. Drag chute improvements were progressing and ways to upgrade the engine's reliability were under review. Armament difficulties, however, remained unsolved.

Click on Picture to enlarge

The success of the F-94C's all-rocket armament hinged on rocket accuracy and interceptor performance reliability. .The F-94C and its rockets had neither. The F-94C's all-rocket armament had been a key selling point. Admittedly, a salvo of rockets would cause more damage than a burst of machinegun fire. Worse, the P-5 engine flamed out when the full-nose load of 24 rockets was salvoed above 26,000 feet. If only 12 rockets were fired, a near flameout still occurred that slowed the interceptor speed. The Air force wanted the problems cured and the rocket load doubled. Both could be done. In fact, the mounting of additional rockets in wing pods had been considered since 1951. Nonetheless, it was unlikely the F -94C would get its extra rockets before the 163d production.

Improvements notwithstanding, two of the four production con tracts (the first, definitive on 27 July 1950, dealt with the F-97A) were cancelled late in the year, cutting F-94C procurement from 617 to 387. The Air Force considered canceling the entire program in July. It held off because of anything better and the need (in the midst of the Korean War) to keep Lockheed in production.

In the spring (beginning with the 100th production-not the 163d), F-94Cs came off the assembly line with wing pod "side arms:' Each pod packed 12 of the Aeromite developed FFARs. The long cylinder pods measured 9 feet 6 inches and their fiber glass nose covers protruded about 6 feet from the wing leading edge. Before the rockets left the pods, the fiberglass covers disintegrated due to rocket-generated gas pressure. The production-improved F-94Cs also came with new ejection seats that would lift both the pilot and radar observer well above the cockpit sill.

With ADC's 437th FIS at Otis AFB. As the first rocket-bearing interceptor, the F-94C generated less enthusiasm than expected. Maintenance crews praised the F-94C, because they could get to its electronics equipment easily. Pilots generally liked the aircraft, commenting that the J48P-6 engine "wheezed, coughed, spurted, and burped at altitude; but it never quit running." Nearly 2 years behind schedule, it showed limited performance. And, clearly, its basic design could not be stretched further to meet future needs. Intended as a "quick-fix" all-weather interceptor to fill the air defense gap until the F-89 was ready, 1949 planning had envisioned an operational F-94C in 1951. Moreover, the F-94C (like the F-94A and B) could not destroy any bomber superior to the Russian TU-4 that compared with the B-29.

Click on Picture to enlarge

The 437th FIS attained initial operational capability in June.

In mid-1954, squadron operational suitability tests confirmed the F-94C's poor weather-proofing and disclosed leaky fuel tanks. They also revealed the need to improve the E-5 fire-control system. During continuing rain in late 1863, 80 percent of the alert aircraft at one base went out of commission. Moisture in the cockpit had short-circuited the electrical and fire-control systems.

Known as Hop-Up, these modifications resolved the F 94C's recently confirmed shortcomings. Early F-94Cs also exchanged their ejection seats for the safer ones featured by later productions. The Hop-Up modification of the E-5 eventually added an optical sight to the system.

The Air Force took delivery of 9 F-94Cs in FY 52, 153 in FY 53, and 225 in FY 54. The YF-94C had been accepted in October 1951. Cost per aircraft was: $534,073.00-airframe, $380,755; engine (installed), $90;147; electronics, $7,058; ordnance, $518; armament, $55;595.

F-94D: A single-seat fighter-bomber for long-range ground sup port. The D would have a high-thrust centrifugal flow turbojet engine with afterburner, plus autopilot and airborne equipment to allow automatic approach and tactical control from the ground. Authorized for procurement in mid-1951 (when the Korean War started), one F -94D prototype was developed (through conversion of an early F-94 production), but the 112 F-94Ds on order were all cancelled.

Despite mediocre performance, the F-94C lasted a long time as a first-line interceptor. The Air Force wanted to get rid of the aircraft, but could ill afford it. The P-94C in mid-1954 (when ADC counted a peak 265) was still regarded as the best two-man interceptor at low altitudes. Despite many structural modifications, the F-89 operated. poorly, particularly at low level; and the Convair F-102 (originally due to enter service in mid-1963) was several years away. As for the development of a low-altitude surface to-air missile (investigated under Project LASAM), this was out of the question insofar as the Air Force was concerned. It planned instead to test low-altitude seekers that ADC could possibly use on its future Bombers. At one time during 1955, 48 percent of the Air Force's remaining F-94Cs were grounded for lack of parts. The F-94C finally. disappeared from USAF rolls in early 1959; from the ANG's in mid 1960.

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

 

More About The F-94 "Starfighter"

 

 

USE YOUR BROWSER "BACK" BUTTON TO RETURN TO PERVIOUS PAGE

Last Updated

05/01/2009

 

POWERED BY

456FIS.ORG